CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor California State Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor California State Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Ace your exam!

Practice this question and more.


Are inspectors and risk assessors responsible for repainting after chip sample collection?

  1. Yes, it is always mandatory

  2. No, unless specified

  3. Only if the client requests it

  4. Yes, in all situations

The correct answer is: No, unless specified

The reasoning behind selecting that inspectors and risk assessors are not responsible for repainting after chip sample collection unless specified is grounded in the regulatory framework governing lead inspections and risk assessments. Inspectors and assessors are primarily focused on identifying and evaluating lead hazards in residential and commercial properties. Their responsibilities include collecting samples, conducting risk assessments, and providing recommendations for remediation, rather than performing remediation work themselves. Repainting after sample collection may not be necessary in every case, especially if the sample collection creates only minimal disturbance or if the surfaces are not a significant concern for lead exposure. In many instances, it is expected that remediation or repainting would be coordinated with a licensed contractor or specialist once the assessment is complete. Therefore, their responsibility for repainting activities would only arise if explicitly specified in the scope of services agreed upon with the client. This highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding the scope of work agreed upon by both the inspector/assessor and the client before beginning any lead-related work.