CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor California State Practice Exam

During a Combination Inspection/Risk Assessment, which paint is assessed?

1. Only new paint applications

2. Surface-by-surface, including deteriorated paint

3. Only paint on wooden surfaces

4. Only lead-free paint

The correct answer is: Surface-by-surface, including deteriorated paint

During a Combination Inspection/Risk Assessment, the correct focus is on assessing paint on a surface-by-surface basis, including deteriorated paint. This comprehensive approach is essential because lead-based paint hazards can be present in various conditions, especially in older structures where paint deterioration may occur. Assessing all surfaces allows for a thorough evaluation of any lead hazards. By examining both intact and deteriorated paint, inspectors can identify potential lead exposure risks that could arise from peeling, chipping, or deteriorating paint that may contain lead. This assessment helps ensure the safety of occupants, particularly young children, who are most vulnerable to lead poisoning. It also aligns with guidelines and regulations pertaining to lead assessments and risk management strategies in housing, especially pre-1978 properties where lead paint was more commonly used. The other options do not adequately address the comprehensive nature of a Combination Inspection/Risk Assessment. Focusing only on new paint applications or limiting the scope to specific surface materials like wood would neglect many potential sources of lead exposure. Similarly, assessing only lead-free paint would ignore the existence and risks associated with any lead-containing paint present on the property.